Even google just admitted to it
Part 1 of 2 in the series. First, we’re going to discuss the fraud, in the second series we’ll discuss how to prevent it
Recently I wrote about my thoughts and research about how people do not like your digital ads – ALL THE HYPE ABOUT ONLY USING DIGITAL FOR YOUR RETAIL STORES MARKETING-I’M NOT BUYING IT – Yep over 75% of people think they’re intrusive and more. Now add this to the mix. Maybe those that are supposedly liking/following/clicking on your ads may be fraudulent.
For close to two years I’ve been inundated with the next best digital marketing platform that we could utilize to help our retailer and brand clients get the most out of utilizing the web to show more, tell more and most of all sell more. I’ve been VERY suspicious of the whole digital marketing FAD for years, that’s why I never have really pushed it on my clients.
That all came to a head on July 17, 2017 when The Wall Street Journal posted a headline that Proctor & Gamble, the world’s largest advertiser announced it was cutting $100MM from its digital ad budget because it was basically INEFFECTIVE. Add this announcement to my previous blogthat people basically HATE digital ads, Ad Blockers are growing ad double digit rates and more, and you’ll hopefully understand why the headline …
Remember the adage from John Wanamaker – “Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don’t know which half”. Well this may be truer today than back in the turn of the century when he stated it.
I’ve sat through dozens of presentations and I must be honest, I don’t understand a lot of what they are presenting and I’m a pretty smart guy. I explain to these people that if I don’t understand it, how will my clients understand it.
With all these companies out there promoting the next best FAD MARKETING gimmick, I asked myself the question: What is the ROI reality of these so called digital ad driven companies? I always hear the words/statements “We Increased Conversions by XXX%”. People, conversions are clicks and these are riddled with potential AD FRAUD and here is why and how it’s done and you don’t know it’s happening.
According to Business Insider, a study commissioned by WPP, clicks automatically generated by bots, could reach $16.4 billion in 2017 and could reach over $50BN in 2025. Hey, this fraud and the profits are second only to organized crime’s drug trade!
But that’s not all. Look at this:
Adloox conducted its study across 200 billion daily bid requests, 4 billion ad calls, and 10 billion ad impressions a month, over a period of 12 months.
“Across the 200 billion bid requests, 50% were detected as being either non-human traffic (either a bot or a hijacked device) or fraudulent traffic, which includes bad actors trying to spoof real web domains to attempt to pass off to ad buyers as premium publishers”.
John Wanamaker would be proud!
EVEN GOOGLE ADMITS THAT THIS IS A HUGE PROBLEM
GOOGLE ISSUING REFUNDS TO ADVERTISERS OVER FAKE TRAFFIC, PLANS NEW SAFEGUARD
Alphabet Inc.’s GOOGL -0.41% Google is issuing refunds to advertisers for ads bought through its platform that ran on sites with fake traffic, people familiar with the situation said, as the company develops a tool to give buyers more transparency about their purchases.
In the past few weeks, Google has informed hundreds of marketers and ad agency partners about the issue with invalid traffic, known in the industry as “ad fraud.” The ads were bought using the company’s DoubleClick Bid Manager.
Google’s refunds amount to only a fraction of the total ad spending served to invalid traffic, which has left some advertising executives unsatisfied, the people familiar with the situation said. Google has offered to repay its “platform fee,” which ad buyers said typically ranges from about 7% to 10% of the total ad buy.
Here’s the worst part. AD FRAUD IS NOT ILLEGAL
One of the biggest reasons fraud is so rampant is simply that it’s not illegal. Unlike credit card fraud, bank fraud, false advertising, etc., nobody is going to jail for ad fraud, and it’s not exactly the sort of activity that elicits a crackdown from law enforcement, which means there is significantly less risk involved. And yet it’s extremely lucrative.
So what are the two main culprits in this massive fraud.
#1 – CLICK FARMS
Click Farms are usually located in developing countries with very low wage rates, such as the Philippines, India, and Bangladesh, among others. Many use proxy servers or VPN
Workers are paid low amounts, perhaps one dollar for a thousand Facebook Likes. Most probably earn about $300 to $400 a year.
The Click Farms then sell their likes and followers at a much higher price.
You can check this yourself.
Just Google the words “Buy Facebook likes” and you’ll find several companies listing prices. They include Buy Cheap Social at $16 for 1,000 ‘real human likes’; BoostLikes at $71 per 1,000 likes; or iBuyFans with 1,000 likes for $17.99 or 10,000 for $149.99.
There are ways to check the validity of your followers. One such option is available for Twitter called Twitter Audit. I used it on my @NapierMarketing Twitter account and I’m happy to say that 98% of my followers are all real. One thing, however, I have 1,557 followers, more than the 1,398 followers they claim).
BUT who are the 16 followers that are fake? I check every request “to follow”, LinkedIn, etc. I review profiles, everything before I accept and it looks like I got duped by 16 people which reaffirms my statement BUYER BEWARE!
When people follow me, I’m astounded when I see they have 100M followers, etc. Hmmmmmm I ask myself.
There is even an advertisement that’s in your face called www.clickmonkeys.com. When researching this article, they came up #1 organically in Google’s search.
Their claim to fame and marketing message is to solicit marketers who are under pressure to have their social platforms perform. If you hire them, you’ll get the clicks/followers, etc. to boost your rankings, creating a perception that you “are liked/loved”.
Their statement on how they work states:
Would we be offering this service over the Internet if it weren’t legal? Hell no! Click Monkeys!!™ is a Ukrainian company and the giant tanker ship click farm we have stationed just outside U.S. waters off the coast of San Francisco is registered at a Ukrainian berth so we’re not subject to any U.S. laws!
Over 20,000 Click Monkeys!!™ live and work aboard our click farm. They work in shifts of 5,000 24 hours aday, 7 daysa week, 365 days a year!! Each monkey is able to access 12 pages per minute which gives us incredible traffic potential, just look at this math:
1 monkey x 1 hour = 720-page views/clicks
1 monkey x 1 day = 17,280-page views/clicks
5,000 monkeys x 1 day 86,400,000 page views/clicks!!!!
If you Google the phrase Click Farm Fraud you’ll get:
I think that makes my point.
In a recent article in ADWEEK it was written “Online ad fraud driven by bots will cost brands $7.2 billion globally this year, according to a forecast in a new joint study by the Association of National Advertisers and White Ops. That’s up from the $6.3 billion the two organizations predicted in a similar report for 2015.
What is a BOT. According to ZVELO
“Ad fraud happens when a bot attempts to imitate legitimate web traffic (acting like a real person visiting a website) and generate additional (but fraudulent) web page views (and therefore revenue) for the website publisher. The advertisers’ budgets are compromised, as their dollars are being wasted on ads being served to bots rather than humans. This results in the advertisers and the end users paying the price for this fraud, as well as being exposed to the risks associated with malicious and fraudulent bots. Recent estimates have put the cost of Ad fraud at 20-30% or more of the online advertising spending, or several billion dollars a quarter.
Some tactics deployed by Ad-fraud bots are:
Advertising Age had a headline;
WOW, 30% is contributed to fraud, John Wanamaker may like this because it’s less than his 50%, but are you willing to accept these numbers? I’m not
EMARKETER HAS WEIGHED IN ON THIS FRAUD, TOO
AND THE “HITS” just keep coming (Pun intended)
SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO.
This company, under the guise of “DOING GOOD” actually does really bad things to your ad budget.
“As online advertising becomes ever more ubiquitous and unsanctioned, AdNauseam works to complete the cycle by automating Ad clicks universally and blindly on behalf of its users. Built atop uBlock Origin, AdNauseam quietly clicks on every blocked ad, registering a visit on ad networks’ databases. As the collected data gathered shows an omnivorous click-stream, user tracking, targeting and surveillance become futile.
AdNauseam is a free browser extension designed to obfuscate browsing data and protect users from tracking by advertising networks. At the same time, AdNauseam serves as a means of amplifying users’ discontent with advertising networks that disregard privacy and facilitate bulk surveillance agendas.
AdNauseam joins a broader class of technical systems that attempt to serve ethical, political, and expressive ends. In light of the industry’s failure to self-regulate or otherwise address the excesses of network tracking, AdNauseam allows individual users to take matters into their own hands, fighting back against unilateral surveillance. Taken in this light, the software follows an approach similar to that of TrackMeNot, employing obfuscation as a strategy to shift the balance of power between the trackers and the tracked. For further information on this approach, please see this paper”.
Oh and there is more, a LOT more. Here are a couple more links to articles from Bloomberg Business Week and The Wall Street Journal.
So what should you do?
First, focus on real people. Email campaigns and digital marketing companies that focus on a users IP address that can marry that information to a real home address and prove it. There are companies out there like El-Toro. I’ve been talking to them for a year, and their case studies in the furniture industry have me convinced they have a better mousetrap. Why? Because they hate “click marketing” and their case studies show successes in sales dollars vs. spend, instead of the ubiquitous Clicks/Conversions vs. sales dollars spent. You can find out more of how this works on my website: www.napiermkt.com
Second, make sure that whoever is running your digital campaigns “prove to you” that the traffic generated is real.
If you Google Digital Ad Auditing, you’ll find 3,600,000 results
If your digital ad company doesn’t give you a full audit, RUN. If they audit shows a percentage of potential BOT/Click Farm Fraud, make sure you get a credit back for that percentage.
In summary, I hate FAD MARKETING. FAD MARKETING is where a marketing person pushes out information on the newest/coolest FAD without providing Due Diligence. They talk their retailers into a platform to spend or waste their money on the newest supposed best way to attract and engage customers. They report ambiguous statistics, use generalities in their results and only provide one side of the equation
That hurts our retailers, makes them suspicious of new or traditional programs that do work, which in turn hurts their profitability and speeds up their demise.
Information shared from ZVELO.COM was posted with permission